Tuesday, November 6, 2012

#452 - PREVIEW | More Voices Demons' Conversation (with me and others)

Things the Voices Demons have said today—all day—written verbatim, from recordings and inter-personal conversation.

Female #1
Listen here, Mr. B: we don't like you; so, we're going to have to create a problem for you.

He's remanded! He's remanded! He's remanded for a lifetime! And, if I have anything to do about it, I wouldn't even let him breathe air.

He masturbated on us, this time, way too much.

When we take Scratchen away from him... [loud bang, intended to hurt my ear, per the Voices Demons]

Female #2
Masturbate a whole problem for us, James B., and we may just get over on you.

Male #1
Pedophile charges are a cogent option for us.

Female #1
James, you're fucking up my program! You're fucking up my program! I won't let you do that!

I'll let them know. [repeats in an echo kind of way that is unique to Voices Demons]

Female #2
Tuzzo people don't get violent, James B. They get even, then they get violent.

Female #1
[singing] He's remanded! He's remanded! He fucked Tuzzo people around; but, they got even. Faggot! Faggot! Faggot! Go Tuzzo! Go Tuzzo!
[accompanying by orchestrated music of poor fidelity, very spooky, although, when written, probably was meant to sound happy; slow-playing, out-of-tune—like an old player piano]

Understand this, James B.: we don't want you in-custody, we need you in-custody.

[mimicking a mock victim of child sexual abuse] "Jimmy Bush put his penis in my mouth, and I didn't like it." And: "Jimmy put it in his mouth and told me not to tell anyone."

Female #2
Basically, they don't want you dead; they want you gone.

Female #3
Let me get [it] or [him] for breakfast.

Male #1
I'm sorry, James. He doesn't like it when you're mean to him; so, he may not call you back. That's what I would say if I knew what I was talking about.

Male #2
Alright! Alright! We could probably go the distance with him; but, we'd have to make him very, very happy, and I just don't think we can do that.

Female #3
Kick his face, kick his face, kick his face in!

Female #2
There's some safety tips in this cabinet that I want removed for another reason.

Demon harm. w/ wrapping on wooden fence
[in cadence written for this phrase by Tuzzo] Masturbate now, tweaker, masturbate!

Male #2
What a dumb-ass tweaker! Now, I have to go home and tell my mom I was molested.

Female #3
If you hadn't masturbated on your dick all day, you wouldn't have any problem with us...not!

#451 - VIDEO | Second woman possessed by demon wearing clown-like makeup

When a female guest leaned into my shot while making video during the period of high demonic activity tonight, her inner demon expressed itself, revealing the fact that it's male, but likes to wear makeup:

While all frames in this portion of the video consistently show the profile of the possessing demon, this one gives the best overall view:
As my guest leans into the shot (upper-right), her face is shown to be superimposed by that of a demon, similar to the mangled and disordered one seen in VIDEO | Porn actor's face morphs into demon's in porn video
The appearance of the demon's face is not caused by any type of distortion, such as motion blurring or the like; in every frame of the portion of the video clip in which it appears, it is consistently that of the demon's:
The demon's face is visible in every frame of the portion of the video in which it is shown; it is not the effect of a motion blur or any other type of distortion

Shortly after the appearance of the demon (within mere seconds), the woman leans into the shot twice more, this time, sans demon:
Seconds later, my guest's face returns to normal
This demon looks similar to the one that revealed itself on video during the production of a porn video, as shown in , and as pictured below:
A porn actor's eyes loll into the back of his head...
...seconds before his inner demon reveals itself, which looks similar to that of the woman's (above)
This is the second demon-possessed woman that I have captured on video; the first woman shown to be possessed can be seen in PHOTO | Video in motion reveals woman's hobgoblin demon underpinnings:
The white mask-like face of a hobgoblin demon, superimposed over the face of a woman it is possessing
Unlike that woman's demon, which was revealed only by video in motion, this demon was revealed in relatively still video, which is rare.

#450 - VIDEOS | What demons look like when they float (instead of walk)

During the period of high demonic activity that occurred tonight, I turned on my iSight camera—as usual—hoping to catch something happening, and, preferably, something new.

I got four something-news, in that I obtained four clips of demons floating by, right in front of my face, which are shown in the reflection on a microwave door.

This is the first such clip, which, as first, I thought was the reflection of one of my house guests until I noticed that they weren't moving up and down as a walker would were moving at a constant forward speed:

When I discovered a second segment showing the same as the first, I was able to compare the two to make sure I wasn't looking at a reflection of something that I thought was a person (or demon), and that the motion comprising its "walk" wasn't coincidental:

Although I was convinced by the first and second segments that I was watching demon float by, a third segment cinched it; it shows two demons of differing size:

This fourth segment, found in another video made shortly thereafter, shows what floating demons look like when they turn around:

I've seen floating demons before—many times, in fact—but they are almost always cloaked, and are rarely observed in routine transit like this. A cloaked demon is a demon on the attack, which means they aren't going to be passing you by; rather, they will be charging you to the point of being in your face.

Still, the fact that they are around—whether attacking or not—portends bad things underway. They wouldn't bother being around people unless they were. They have better everything; there's nothing you have that they want or need, I promise. Our lives, by comparison, are of remote jungle tribe quality to them.

When demons float (instead of walk), only their heads, torsos, and waists are visible; their legs appear to fade downwards into nothing. By contrast, you can see the entire bodies of demons that employ dark cloaks (def. pend.), such as phantom demons and some varieties of eye-spider demons, including their legs, which they actually appear to be using while moving. Only cloaked demons float.

How a microwave door unveiled invisible demons
Following are two copy-and-pasted online articles, which may help explain how a dual-paned, glossy microwave door unveiled otherwise invisible demons (in other words, how the camera saw in a reflection what I could not see in front of my face). When I learn more, I'll make sense of it all; in the meantime, even those with a rudimentary background in science should be able to follow the information presented in them so long as you remember that cloaks are meant to prevent you from seeing light reflective off of a demon.
NOTE | For more information on the science behind the demonic cloak, read SCIENCE | The ethereal glow and semi-transparency of cloaked demons explained.

A light wave is an electromagnetic wave that travels through the vacuum of outer space. Light waves are produced by vibrating electric charges. The nature of such electromagnetic waves is beyond the scope of The Physics Classroom Tutorial. For our purposes, it is sufficient to merely say that an electromagnetic wave is a transverse wave that has both an electric and a magnetic component.
The transverse nature of an electromagnetic wave is quite different from any other type of wave that has been discussed in The Physics Classroom Tutorial. Let's suppose that we use the customary slinky to model the behavior of an electromagnetic wave. As an electromagnetic wave traveled towards you, then you would observe the vibrations of the slinky occurring in more than one plane of vibration. This is quite different than what you might notice if you were to look along a slinky and observe a slinky wave traveling towards you. Indeed, the coils of the slinky would be vibrating back and forth as the slinky approached; yet these vibrations would occur in a single plane of space. That is, the coils of the slinky might vibrate up and down or left and right. Yet regardless of their direction of vibration, they would be moving along the same linear direction as you sighted along the slinky. If a slinky wave were an electromagnetic wave, then the vibrations of the slinky would occur in multiple planes. Unlike a usual slinky wave, the electric and magnetic vibrations of an electromagnetic wave occur in numerous planes. A light wave that is vibrating in more than one plane is referred to as unpolarized light. Light emitted by the sun, by a lamp in the classroom, or by a candle flame is unpolarized light. Such light waves are created by electric charges that vibrate in a variety of directions, thus creating an electromagnetic wave that vibrates in a variety of directions. This concept of unpolarized light is rather difficult to visualize. In general, it is helpful to picture unpolarized light as a wave that has an average of half its vibrations in a horizontal plane and half of its vibrations in a vertical  plane.
It is possible to transform unpolarized light into polarized light. Polarized light waves are light waves in which the vibrations occur in a single plane. The process of transforming unpolarized light into polarized light is known as polarization. There are a variety of methods of polarizing light. The four methods discussed on this page are:
Polarization by Use of a Polaroid Filter
The most common method of polarization involves the use of a Polaroid filter. Polaroid filters are made of a special material that is capable of blocking one of the two planes of vibration of an electromagnetic wave. (Remember, the notion of two planes or directions of vibration is merely a simplification that helps us to visualize the wavelike nature of the electromagnetic wave.) In this sense, a Polaroid serves as a device that filters out one-half of the vibrations upon transmission of the light through the filter. When unpolarized light is transmitted through a Polaroid filter, it emerges with one-half the intensity and with vibrations in a single plane; it emerges as polarized light.

A Polaroid filter is able to polarize light because of the chemical composition of the filter material. The filter can be thought of as having long-chain molecules that are aligned within the filter in the same direction. During the fabrication of the filter, the long-chain molecules are stretched across the filter so that each molecule is (as much as possible) aligned in say the vertical direction. As unpolarized light strikes the filter, the portion of the waves vibrating in the vertical direction are absorbed by the filter. The general rule is that the electromagnetic vibrations that are in a direction parallel to the alignment of the molecules are absorbed.
The alignment of these molecules gives the filter a polarization axis. This polarization axis extends across the length of the filter and only allows vibrations of the electromagnetic wave that are parallel to the axis to pass through. Any vibrations that are perpendicular to the polarization axis are blocked by the filter. Thus, a Polaroid filter with its long-chain molecules aligned horizontally will have a polarization axis aligned vertically. Such a filter will block all horizontal vibrations and allow the vertical vibrations to be transmitted (see diagram above). On the other hand, a Polaroid filter with its long-chain molecules aligned vertically will have a polarization axis aligned horizontally; this filter will block all vertical vibrations and allow the horizontal vibrations to be transmitted.
Polarization of light by use of a Polaroid filter is often demonstrated in a Physics class through a variety of demonstrations. Filters are used to look through and view objects. The filter does not distort the shape or dimensions of the object; it merely serves to produce a dimmer image of the object since one-half of the light is blocked as it passed through the filter. A pair of filters is often placed back to back in order to view objects looking through two filters. By slowly rotating the second filter, an orientation can be found in which all the light from an object is blocked and the object can no longer be seen when viewed through two filters. What happened? In this demonstration, the light was polarized upon passage through the first filter; perhaps only vertical vibrations were able to pass through. These vertical vibrations were then blocked by the second filter since its polarization filter is aligned in a horizontal direction. While you are unable to see the axes on the filter, you will know when the axes are aligned perpendicular to each other because with this orientation, all light is blocked. So by use of two filters, one can completely block all of the light that is incident upon the set; this will only occur if the polarization axes are rotated such that they are perpendicular to each other.
A picket-fence analogy is often used to explain how this dual-filter demonstration works. A picket fence can act as a polarizer by transforming an unpolarized wave in a rope into a wave that vibrates in a single plane. The spaces between the pickets of the fence will allow vibrations that are parallel to the spacings to pass through while blocking any vibrations that are perpendicular to the spacings. Obviously, a vertical vibration would not have the room to make it through a horizontal spacing. If two picket fences are oriented such that the pickets are both aligned vertically, then vertical vibrations will pass through both fences. On the other hand, if the pickets of the second fence are aligned horizontally,  then the vertical vibrations that pass through the first fence will be blocked by the second fence. This is depicted in the diagram below.
In the same manner, two Polaroid filters oriented with their polarization axes perpendicular to each other will block all the light. Now that's a pretty cool observation that could never be explained by a particle view of light.

Polarization by Reflection
Unpolarized light can also undergo polarization by reflection off of nonmetallic surfaces. The extent to which polarization occurs is dependent upon the angle at which the light approaches the surface and upon the material that the surface is made of. Metallic surfaces reflect light with a variety of vibrational directions; such reflected light is unpolarized. However, nonmetallic surfaces such as asphalt roadways, snowfields and water reflect light such that there is a large concentration of vibrations in a plane parallel to the reflecting surface. A person viewing objects by means of light reflected off of nonmetallic surfaces will often perceive a glare if the extent of polarization is large. Fishermen are familiar with this glare since it prevents them from seeing fish that lie below the water. Light reflected off a lake is partially polarized in a direction parallel to the water's surface. Fishermen know that the use of glare-reducing sunglasses with the proper polarization axis allows for the blocking of this partially polarized light. By blocking the plane-polarized light, the glare is reduced and the fisherman can more easily see fish located under the water.

Polarization by Refraction
Polarization can also occur by the refraction of light. Refraction occurs when a beam of light passes from one material into another material. At the surface of the two materials, the path of the beam changes its direction. The refracted beam acquires some degree of polarization. Most often, the polarization occurs in a plane perpendicular to the surface. The polarization of refracted light is often demonstrated in a Physics class using a unique crystal that serves as a double-refracting crystal. Iceland Spar, a rather rare form of the mineral calcite, refracts incident light into two different paths. The light is split into two beams upon entering the crystal. Subsequently, if an object is viewed by looking through an Iceland Spar crystal, two images will be seen. The two images are the result of the double refraction of light. Both refracted light beams are polarized - one in a direction parallel to the surface and the other in a direction perpendicular to the surface. Since these two refracted rays are polarized with a perpendicular orientation, a polarizing filter can be used to completely block one of the images. If the polarization axis of the filter is aligned perpendicular to the plane of polarized light, the light is completely blocked by the filter; meanwhile the second image is as bright as can be. And if the filter is then turned 90-degrees in either direction, the second image reappears and the first image disappears. Now that's pretty neat observation that could never be observed if light did not exhibit any wavelike behavior.

Thin Film Interference
The emphasis of Lesson 1 of this unit is to present some evidence that has historically supported the view that light behaves as a wave. The reflection, refraction and diffraction of light waves is one strand of evidence. The interference of light waves is a second strand of evidence. In the early nineteenth century, Thomas Young showed that the interference of light passing through two slits produces an interference pattern when projected on a screen. In this section of Lesson 1, we will investigate another example of interference that provides further evidence in support of the wavelike behavior of light.
Perhaps you have witnessed streaks of color on a car windshield shortly after it has been swiped by a windshield wiper or a squeegee at a gas station. The momentary streaks of color are the result of interference of light by the very thin film of water or soap that remains on the windshield. Or perhaps you have witnessed streaks of color in a thin film of oil resting upon a water puddle or concrete driveway. These streaks of color are the result of the interference of light by the very thin film of oil that is spread over the water surface. This form of interference is commonly called thin film interference and provides another line of evidence for the wave behavior of light.
Light wave interference results when two waves are traveling through a medium and meet up at the same location. So what exactly is causing this thin film interference? What is the source of the two waves? When a wave (light waves included) reaches the boundary between two media, a portion of the wave reflects off the boundary and a portion is transmitted across the boundary. The reflected portion of the wave remains in the original medium. The transmitted portion of the wave enters the new medium and continues traveling through it until it reaches a subsequent boundary. If the new medium is a thin film, then the transmitted wave does not travel far before it reaches a new boundary and undergoes the usual reflection and transmission behavior. Thus, there are two waves that emerge from the film - one wave that is reflected off the top of the film (wave 1 in the diagram) and the other wave that reflects off the bottom of the film (wave 2 in the diagram).
These two waves could interfere constructively if they meet two conditions. One condition is that the two waves must be relatively close together such that their crests and troughs can meet up with each other and cause the interference. To meet this condition, the light must be incident at angles close to zero with respect to the normal. (This is not shown in the diagram above in order to space out the waves for clarity sake.) A second condition that must be met is that the wave that travels through the film and back into the original medium must have traveled just the right distance such that it is in phase with the other reflected wave. Two waves that are in phase are waves that are always at the same point on their wave cycle. That is, the two waves must be forming crests at the same location and at the same moment in time and forming troughs at the same location and at the same moment in time. In order for the second condition to occur, the thickness of the film must be just perfect.
If wave 1 and wave 2 meet these two conditions as they reflect and exit the film, then they will constructively interfere. As will be learned in Lesson 2, light that is visible to our eyes consists of a collection of light waves of varying wavelength. Each wavelength is characterized by its own color. So a red light wave has a different wavelength than an orange light wave that has a different wavelength than a yellow light wave. While the thickness of a film at a given location may not allow a red and an orange light wave to emerge from the film in phase, it may be just perfect to allow a yellow light wave to emerge in phase. So at a given location on the film, the yellow light wave undergoes constructive interference and becomes brighter than the other colors within the incident light. As such, the film appears yellow when viewed by incident sunlight. Other locations of the film may be just perfect to constructively reinforce red light. And still others area of the film may be of perfect thickness for the constructive reinforcement of green light. Because different locations of the film may be of appropriate thickness to reinforce different colors of light, the thin film will show streaks of color when viewed from above.
While the mathematics of thin film interference can become quite complicated, it is clear from this discussion that thin film interference is another phenomenon that can only be explained using a wave model of light.