Sunday, November 30, 2014

UPDATE | Demons, their people continue to exploit, cause suffering via open portals

Oops, I did it again; I opened certain kinds of doors, which people and things with evil agendas and insatiable lusts for blood have made prodigious use of in the past—albeit unwillingly, even though expectedly, I do confess:

Believe it or not, going forward, I own the problem you see in those images, which were made by Haarp Ti, the woman mentioned in Demon people fail at attempt to use powers on their own, and which describes specifically how I own the problem (and how I own a couple of other things, too).

Here's what's going on in her post to Google+: When demons attack during periods of high demonic activity, she takes photos of them, but that with far less success than me. That's due to the complexity involved in acquiring a decent photo of a demon—you have to be around a lot of them, and at the very core of their activity to get the once-in-a-lifetime, one-and-only shots that I do (that is, if you're not a friend to them, I should point out). On top of that, you have to work around actual magic, if you will, specifically suited for avoiding camera detection. Finally, you have to be able to process your images so others can see what you saw [see Enhancing demon faces made anywhere, at anytime, from anything], or to see what you didn't [see Automating mapping of demons hidden in digital media].

The method to her madness
But, those factors aren't the most applicable to her situation; rather, the fact that she's being hurt is, hence the plastic wrap. I'm not sure if it's helping; but, I know some thought when into her choice to wrap herself in it. I base that on these facts:
She clearly made a connection between those facts and the static electricity inherent to plastic sheeting, a connection bought at a steep price, I can guarantee (and, as you can tell by her photos). At one point, she observed that certain conditions must be in place and/or absent for certain kinds of physical transactions between demon and human [see Objects', persons' electrical conductivity limits demonic power]. The photos show the results of her effort to take control of those conditions.

I believe her to be stuck on this one, though, as she is clearly still vulnerable; the fact that she still does this after having done it unsuccessfully for so long tells me that her vulnerability has subjected her to the demons' and their peoples' preferred method of inflicting injury, and that is injury to the mind:
Haarp Ti's Google+ profile page contains thousands of images made during periods of high demonic activityAll images like those shown above were posted at the same time as my blog posts and never any other time
The apology and the promise
I, however, have made it just slightly further than she in my efforts to countermand human butchering by demons and their people; to encourage her, I tell (and show) her that, and share my own suffering and losses at the same time in my comment to her most recent post:
My bad on this one, that is to say, the circumstances resulting in your atypical use of plastic wrap and picture-snapping bonanza [see Haarp Ti's photos]. I take responsibility for it, just like last time, and nearly every time before, as is explained in this old post from way back (which I've shown you before, and which also explains why and how this happened to you recently):
All I can say is: hang in there. I'm making much progress on the problem— groundbreaking progress, in fact. For example, there are now ways for anyone and everyone to detect demonic activity on their own:
...there are now ways to find demons in hiding:
...and there are now ways to predict attacks and their degree of power and influence: 
I doubt these are new; but, to us—those of us who would never be anyone but us—I believe it is.
As you can surmise, I will have full attention on this problem at some point in the very near future, one way or another; nothing you've suffered at my hand will go unrepaid (God says so, even if I don't—but, I do). I think those three posts alone lead to that very thing, not to mention the data in my private notes.
I hope to make it so that the lazy and afraid no longer benefit from the demonic cloak as the demons do, and so that the falsely pious can see that they are immune to nothing the Devil throws their way. (All that, plus possibly end most disease and strife by cutting it off at its source; but, I digress...)
A picture you sent me is in the first of the those three posts, by the way; I am using it to demonstrate how to verify the authenticity of third-party photos showing demonic activity; your image passed my new Fourier-transform-wavelet-scale analysis scheme. 
So, enjoy those posts, knowing that, for you and others like you, these things are being done, and at no small price; rather, at the expense of my own blood...literally. [Matthew 16:25a]
Eventually, you will be able to show to whoever asks that you were in the right, that you were injured and beleaguered—not crazy. That you were not irresponsible or inattentive in and to your life, but quite busy with a problem no one person can handle alone.
By the way, I'm looking to move my demons away from their native territory—sort of like when I took them on a timeout to Indiana recently. They are unruly, and it's time to quash them. How can I find a home in the desert that won't leave me dead in less than a week? Doing so should put an end to 99% of the drama that crops up in peoples' lives far too frequently, as it does in yours.
It's time, I figure. I have all the data I need to turn the tide, and my hand is still on the throttle. I decide who gets to go where, and what they have and don't have, power- and influence-wise that is (you know what I mean by that...).
That is a problematic position to be in. Some people are taking the wrong kind of advantage of demons and their power, and they are hurting me, themselves and others. My little family is in shambles because of them.
There's Long, whose face can be seen mangled in the ether by his own demonic weapons (that he shouldn't have) in photos at the end of this post:
Then, there's a new video showing the deafness they caused Scratchen at the end of this one:
They are threatening to do other things, too; and, I believe it is within their power to carry out those threats (things government- and industry-related).
So, please let me know if you can help with the move in some way; planning and implementing things like that are next-to-impossible for me, as I'm sure—of all people—you would know best why.
We hardly think of helping others when we are as overwhelmed as you and I are; but, I think the key to solving our own mutual problem is to reach out to each other, regardless of our respective circumstances. I can't back it up, but I believe this to be a God-given test we must pass. So, I'll keep working on my end; let me know what you can do on yours.
I intend to walk through those pearly gates having never given up on my sense of and God-given right to personal dignity, having humbled and tempered it with an intimate awareness that I need others for that.
P.S. — You're not alone in your response to this latest period of high demonic activity; others did the very same thing—take pictures, post them online, and offer their insights, albeit not as effectively as the they deserve:

NOTE | For anyone doubting the veracity of my claim that I central to hyperdimensional portal activity—that my person can be utilized for the purposes of opening such doors—a demonstration can be arranged. Just ask. Until then, I'll keep them closed. Wrong use by the wrong people, and all that.
Background Summary
In order to follow this post—and, quite frankly, to follow the blog—with any degree of understanding, you must know something about me that is unique among all: that I (magnetize and transmute energy of some unknown kind to another unknown kind that allows demons to come to us, people to be taken to them, and physical interaction between the two possible.

It does much more than that, though; it causes the fourth-dimension to overlap our dimension, giving people, places and things fourth-dimensional properties, which, by and large, means your perceptions become reality, your senses and intellect are shareable and forceable...I don't know exactly how to say it, but, generally, things get what they would call in the olden days magic. This is not significant to demons, who are born and raised in a magical world, but to humans who only dreamed of having powers such as those they now can possess as pseudo-fourth dimensional citizens.

The problem is, humans are all bad, and are doing all bad things with their powers. They are influenced by the demons who taught them how to use them; whether the original intent was to be malicious is not likely, but looking at the teacher, you can't be surprised that things turned out that way.

Demons are superior in intellect, physical prowess, culture, wisdom, experience as galaxy-wide citizens and eons of history that put them so far above humans, that they cannot see humans as much more than one of the inferior races they have conquered and enslaved.

As a consequence of the attitudes and viewpoints of these betters-in-all-ways when it comes to lower life like humans, the humans paired with the demons have adopted a new set of right-and-wrong, and have extended their purview to their sense justice outside of what our society and every society on earth has granted individuals.

In other words, they are using the really cool powers demons taught them to throw their weight around this world, launching physical attacks against anyone who steps over the line in the sand drawn by their "anger." The list of things that anger them grow by the day, and is the biggest list of any list out there.

Moreover, the problem is complicated by telepathic and verbal communication with demons, who, even while their voices may sound like human voices, broadcast part of their meaning, emotion, sense of importance or gravity telepathically. To other demons, this simply clarifies the words, and gives them the full life of one who experienced the events the words describe; but, to a human—and perhaps it's because they are untrained or new—they feel these words as if they were their own thoughts on a subliminal level, I think because their minds were not made to handle that kind of telepathy without having learned to handle it from birth (your mind chooses to rely on your wealth of experience and knowledge more and more as one ages; it is difficult, then, to adopt a new way of processing, visualizing, storing, and recalling information like that conveyed in demon speech if you haven't been doing it since you were young. Interesting to note is that this is why most people cannot remember details of their encounters with demons as well as they can with people; it is also why people are tired after dealing with demons, even when the encounter was not particular intense or unusual. The brain requires much energy, at least three times so to verbally interact with demons. NOTE | That's why the Voices Demons are put on the front line of any offensive against a human. They are simply deadly to listen to.). They feel internal consternance when they disagree with something they hear a demon say.  The consequence of keeping up the fight to disagree is well known to humans who talk to demons: exhaustion, depression, anger, and the like. As a demon person, you not only fight the demon, but your own mind when you disagree.

Unless I do this with specific intent, it doesn't happen;

Thursday, November 27, 2014

TECHNOLOGY | Detecting (real) demonic activity in digital media

I call the posts to this blog my notes, which I thought at the time I called them that might absolve me from all criticism from incompleteness, error, relevance, etc. I felt like that was the best thing to do, given my situation. They're my notes, which are there for other people to read, but are not written for other people. If I were blogging about my yacht or fashion, I would have held myself to the regular blogger standard; but, I'm under attack, and I'm injured, so lowering expectations seemed prudent.

The problem is that when I post something while I'm working on it, the already-low standard gets attributed to plain ol' sloppiness. Or, worse: craziness. From just notes, to scribbles and doodles, too. That's the risk I ran with these two recents posts, which are far from finished, but I think warranted early publication:
This post is a lot of scribbling and doodling, but it's not about masturbation or anger. While that's definitely a plus, unfortunately, it might not make sense right now unless you've had some product management and/or engineering experience with a tech company, and therefore can visualize an end-use or product from the raw material presented herein.

Still, I wanted to put this information out now, because it's science applied to a problem (i.e., the demon plague) with far too much myth surrounding it. Anything that interacts with us in our world has a physical component to it—whether classified as spirit or not. If you can see it, it emits physical light; if you can hear it, physical sound. And, if it touches you, believe me, it can be touched back, the particulars notwithstanding. That means it's relevant to keep an eye on the problem however you can That, by the way, is what this post is about: detecting the presence of demons via a specific pattern to the standard deviation measurements among multiple subsets of frequencies of images made during periods of high demonic activity.

This pattern can be detected mathematically, which means detection can be automated programmatically using common household electronics (e.g., an iPhone) and free software (e.g., GIMP). An app that takes time-lapse images, processes them and measures the standard deviation with the command-line version of GIMP, and then returns the results based on the pattern I establish here is now doable—and easily, too. A GIMP script that automates detection and indicates whether the image shows demonic activity, is forthcoming.

In the meantime, this post describes the criteria for identifying images made during periods of high demonic activity, and provides instructions for evaluating that criteria via advanced image filtering techniques using GIMP.

Experienced digital photographers of demons can easily identify pics and videos made during periods of high demonic activity by the color noise invariably caused by chroma—a form of EMF radiation always present during those periodic, intermediary spans of time in which demons are the most dangerous and harmful. But, while it may look like most other kinds of color noise, it has several distinct characteristics that differentiate it.

In photos, the difference can be seen in the density and size of the red, green (and yellow) and blue snow, which seems to lay on or cling to or wrap around certain surfaces (versus laying on top of the image like a blanket as other noise does). On video, the difference is most noticeable; chroma exhibits observable, expected (or predictable) behavior around certain objects and subjects and in certain circumstances [see "Zap" emits EMF radiation visible to digital camera], indicating that the color noise is not due to low-light conditions or poor-quality electronics, but is actually due to the way the camera translates the imprint made by chroma—a thing of substance and reality—into image data via its sensor. The fact that the presence of chroma allows for otherwise invisible demons to be seen in digital images [see Sucker demons swarm eyes, face to blind, disfigure] also distinguishes it from other forms of color noise, which never enhances anything, but, rather, mars.

The following still frames were taken from three different videos made during periods of high demonic activity, and, consequently, show the inevitable chroma that accompanies them:

1 | Image showing high demonic activity2 | Image showing high demonic activity
3 | Image showing high demonic activity
These are the characteristics of chroma, as seen in each of the images above, that distinguish it from regular color noise:
  1. In image #1, chroma appears to cling to the surface of my head as it makes visible the in-the-ether injuries from demonic weapons (the black spots or holes) and the sucker demon-variety demonic entities that look like smudges on my cheek and neck;
  2. In image #2, chroma illuminates the sucker demons, standing upright on the top of my head and arm of my jacket, as well as the white-glowing demonic entity that sometimes lodges (and shines) in the whites of my eyes to impair my vision;
  3. In image #3, chroma illuminates the skin-coloring of one of my possessing demons [see also Comparing demonic activity in light and shadow], clinging to the parts of my body like the color of the parts not exhibiting characteristics of possession [see also Human hands and forearms disappear, reappear as demonic].
In some images, chroma can be seen flowing in currents from hands that are demonic weapons; on video, it gives demon-possessed objects a hand-drawn sunbeam effect around the edges, and also illuminates focused beams of demonic radiation. In this video (play full-screen at 1080p HD only), the dense, fast-moving red snow flowing in a path for the pair of socks towards me is such a radiation beam; a demo has possessed the socks, and is firing his beam at me:

Easier than distinguishing between chroma and color noise

... (consider using all interior samples)...

Low-demonic-activity image #1 (lighted interior sample)Low-demonic-activity image #2 (nighttime/dark interior sample)
Low-demonic-activity image #3 (daylight sample)
By contrast, digital video made when demonic activity is relatively lower do not show any noise...:

A third-party sample of a digital image showing demonic activity...:

Whether third-party digital images such as this one were made during a period of high demonic activity can now be verified
Evaluating images for demonic activity using GIMP
  1. Open image in GIMP. (Notes about pasting an image into a new image file)
  2. Run the FFT Forward filter (Filters -- > Generic --> FFT Forward).
  3. Run the Wavelet decompose filter (Filters --> Generic --> Wavelet Decompose...), scaling the image by 9 layers.
  4. Select the Wavelet scale 1 layer.
  5. Open the Histogram, which you will use to read the standard deviation of each wavelet scale.
  6. Arrow-down each Wavelet scale layer, keeping an eye on the standard deviation.
  7. Make a note of the Wavelet scale layer in which the standard deviation is 0.001; the number of the layer determines whether the image was made during a period of high demonic activity.
text (note to self: run Fourier filter on a single channel [decompose the original image into RGB, LAB, etc., and determine whether differences are exaggerated]...

In all images showing high demonic activity (and, in none of the images showing low demonic activity), the standard deviation (as measured in the histogram palette) leveled off at .001 at wavelet scale 6 or greater—never less; in images showing low demonic activity, wavelet scale 5 or less—never greater. The following images show the wavelet scale at which each image measured a standard deviation of 0.001:

Wavelet scale - Standard deviation 0.001 or 0.002*
High Demonic Activity Sample Image #1 - Wavelet scale 6 (7 pre-adjustment)
High Demonic Activity Sample Image #2 - Wavelet scale 6 (adjustment not applicable)
High Demonic Activity Sample Image #3 - Wavelet scale 7 (adjustment not applicable)
Low Demonic Activity Sample Image #1 - Wavelet scale 5 (6 pre-adjustment)
Low Demonic Activity Sample Image #2 - Wavelet scale 3
Low Demonic Activity Sample Image #3 - Wavelet scale 5

Applying the wavelet-scale 6 adjustment 
An adjustment must be applied to any image measuring 0.001 standard deviation at wavelet scale 6 to prevent false positives, that is, images showing low demonic activity that register as showing high demonic activity. The difference between a wavelet-scale 6 low-activity image and a wavelet-scale 6 high-activity image is in the slope of the standard-deviation curve: in low-activity images, the curve drops steeply, and then levels off slowly—for at least three wavelet scales—measuring between 0.002-0.003 and 0.001. Choosing the median value (as statistics indicates in such cases), i.e., wavelet scale 5 or less, will accurately classify the image as showing low demonic activity.

To distinguish the rare low-demonic-activity image that falls on the border between high and low, choose the median between the first wavelet scale measuring 0.001 and two wavelet scales prior.

 the standard deviation for three successive layers is 0.002, 0.002 and 0.001, choose the wavelet scale after the first measurement of 0.002 and before 0.001.

In the samples above, an image showing low demonic activity (Low Demonic Activity Sample Image #1) measured a standard deviation of 0.001 at wavelet scale 6, falsely indicating that it was made during a period of high demonic activity. This is likely caused by the sunlight from window, and is why demon-detectors should be installed indoors, away from windows.

The difference, then, can be determined by the standard deviation curve, drops steeply and then levels off slowly, at least for three wavelet scales, measuring between 0.002 and 0.001. To distinguish the rare low-demonic-activity image that falls on the border between high and low, choose the median between the first wavelet scale measuring 0.001 and two wavelet scales prior.

Applying the three-wavelet-scale level-off adjustment to the falsely-categorized image (Low Demonic Activity Sample Image #1), wavelet scale 6 was indicated, in that wavelet scale 4 and 5 both measure a standard deviation of 0.002 and wavelet scale 6 measures 0.001.

Performing this second check on every image that measure a standard deviation at wavelet scale 6 should not result false negatives for images showing high demonic activity, even if the standard deviation curve levels off slowly, etc.

To verify this, two images showing high demonic activity were chosen where the wavelet scale was 7 and 6, respectively; wavelet scale 7 to show that the adjustment will not raise the wavelet scale above 6, and 6 to show that the curve in such images does not the three-wavelet-scale level-off if the standard deviation reaches 0.001 at or prior to wavelet scale 6.

In High Demonic Activity Sample Image #1, wavelet scale 5 and 6 both measure a standard deviation of 0.002 and wavelet scale 7 measures 0.001, therefore, wavelet scale 6 was chosen, just to demonstrate that, even when the adjustment is applied to images showing high demonic activity, the wavelet scale will never equal less than 6.
NOTE | But, even if it did, in most scenarios, more than one still frame will be used for analysis, and it is not likely that all still frames showing high demonic activity will be false-negatives.
An application that took time-lapsed images, ran command-line GIMP on each image, specifically, the Fourier filter and then the Wavelet Decompose filter, and then measured the standard deviation via the histogram...could detect the onset of high demonic activity.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Court postpones release of serial stalker, cites danger to community

On Monday of last week, I saw my stalker's face for the first time in federal court, and learned his name for the first time, too. It's Timothy Lucey, and this is what the back of his head looks like:

District Court Judge Paul S. Grewal discusses bail hearing calendaring with the attorney assigned to Defendant Timothy Lucey, the serial stalker arrested by the FBI the Friday before the hearing
He's wearing the same clothes I've worn any number of times since the (overt) attack by demons and their people, the very same clothes I wore four out of the past six years, and the clothes they continue to vow I will wear again in the near future—that is to say, jail clothes [see Voices Demons' weigh options to deprive me of freedom].
NOTE | To that end, they are inducing sleepless nights and perilous days via the kind of attacks well-described and shown throughout this blog; but, not only am I'm holding up [see BIBLE | Fighting the Good Fight: How a demoniac fights like a Christian], but I'm continuing to make progress in my efforts to stunt and otherwise quell their agenda of evil [see The Death Wish of a Demoniac: Fighting the demon-allied drug trade].
The following video shows the stalker entering the courtroom of Judge Paul S. Grewal for his bail hearing:

The video also shows another victim seated in the courtroom next to the FBI agent who arrested the stalker; but, that victim is not the same one who originally filed the complaint for stalking with the FBI [see Victim of same cyberstalker suggests joint complaint to FBI:
The serial stalker's third victim also appeared at the hearingThe FBI agent who arrested the stalker
I'm loathe to make assumptions but, clearly, the stalker has/had the same agenda as those shown in AUDIO | Homeless shelter staff fag-bashes via loudspeaker, in which "fags are being targeted for expulsion from society," as the Voices Demons put it.

I find it ironic, then, that he is wearing brown, the color assigned to inmates who have requested to be housed in protective custody, where homosexuals are automatically housed in order to keep them safer than they would otherwise be in the general population of prisoners.

The arrest of the stalker is detailed in FBI arrests stalker, detention hearing in federal court next Monday, and the links therein describe his history as it pertains to his crimes against me and others.

Just prior to the hearing, I received this e-mail from my grandmother, who apparently reads this blog:

The arrest suggests no such thing, as I've made clear in Voices Demons: "Your family will be arrestable".

Monday, November 24, 2014

How demons alter matter (and what it looks like when they do)

The images in this post are as rare as gold, in that they show what objects look like as their molecules are made pliable and otherwise manipulatable by a demon's energy; specifically, those objects include a t-shirt and a USB cable. Viewing them in their transitory state between the norm and the demonic is like peering at some commonplace thing under a microscope for the first time, and at once  seeing the things you've seen over and over before in a new and impossibly different light.

There have been a multiplicity of images posted to this blog showing demons that have formed their faces from shirtsblanketspillowsscarvesflags and more; but, until now, there have been no images—or even an explanation—of the particulars of the transition from a regular piece of cloth to the face of the demon possessing it.

This post provides such images and proffers such an explanation: first, by showing snapshots of fabric being reformed by its possessing demon at the molecular level; and, then, by providing an explanation (per physics) for what is shown, and an explanation (per exobiology) of how a demon alters matter.

Possessed t-shirt whirlpools into shape
These images show an otherwise dry, old and faded cotton demon-possessed T-shirt whirling into a miasma of liquid, silvery sand as its possessing demon shapes it into his face:
Objects in a state of bimolecular transition spin in place [see close-up, below]The face can be seen forming in the eye of the molecular hurricane [see close-up, below]
The eye of the transition is where the face is first formed The beginnings of a face are more evident in this close-up, in which the eyes can be seen more clearly
The images are still frames taken from a video made during a period of high demonic activity, and were captured as I picked up the t-shirt while the demon/t-shirt was in mid-transition. The video also shows over a dozen different demonic faces formed in the folds of the t-shirt as it lays on the floor—all 12 or so in about as many frames (that's in half-a-second's time), making images like these rare ad worthy of note.
NOTE | A video in Demon shapes scarf into multiple variations of face on-the-fly shows a demon changing its face from one to another using a woman's scarf about 6 or 7 times in under a second.
But, the fact that a demon can form its face in 1/15th of a second out of clothing material is only one of the reasons why images like the above are one-of-a-kind; the other is the likelihood of a digital camera being in the right proximity to the demon during its transition, the likelihood of the lighting being just right, and the likelihood of a demon performing the act when both of those conditions are met are unlikely—unless you're me, around whom this event is so commonplace that all I had to do was carry my camera around constantly for years in order to get a few snapshots.

Putting sarcasm aside, and turning back to the sobering matter of knowing our enemy, these images provide key data on the physical makeup of demons when combined with what is known as transition state theory.

According to the theory, the glossy appearance of the t-shirt, which almost appears to crumble into sand as the demon shapes it, is the result of bimolecular reaction, a transition state formed when two molecules' old bonds are weakened and new bonds begin to form (or, when old bonds break to form the transition state, after which new bonds form). It suggests further that as reactant molecules (the demon itself) approach each other closely, they are momentarily in a less stable state than either the reactants (the demon's energy) or the product (the reformed t-shirt), causing the t-shirt to look as if it were melting by molecular decoherence, as if it were a sort of cross between liquid and solid:

One section of fabric pours itself into the rushing current of another (center-top)
The fact that the t-shirt is known to be altered this way reveals that a demon's molecules are amped up by enough energy to excite other molecules into a state of bimolecular transition—and, that's no small amount of energy. The existence of this type and amount of energy in demons is further demonstrated by their ability to alter their molecules' relative time flow rate, and to cloak (invisibility) and permeate (pass-through) them, as well as to create and use hyperdimensional portals (pinching two points in space together for single-step travel from one end of the universe to the other).

At first glance, the portion of the fabric at the bottom simply looks blurred by motion—but not if you compare it to the segment of the fabric next to it, which is not blurred as it would be if the shirt was in motion, but is simply out-of-focus due to its proximity to the camera (and overexposed, due to its proximity to the camera light)
Knowing the ways a demon can use its energy-saturated physiology allows for the assumption that the energy-emitting characteristics of demons in general are actuated biologically, and, based on the product at the end of that expended energy (i.e., faces, which are only visible from the position and at the angle particular to the viewer), are linked to the creative and intuitive, conscious and autonomic functions of their minds:

One of more than a dozen faces formed in 1/15th of a second by its possessing demon out of a t-shirt on the floorAnother face, formed in a t-shirt laying on the floor by a demon; one of over a dozen, all formed in less than a second
An unprocessed still frame from a video showing the product of a demon's effort to fold a shirt into a hard-to-see faceAnother unprocessed still frame from a video showing the product of a demon's effort to fold a shirt into a hard-to-see face
Splicing cable, demon-style
Following are close-up images of what a cable looks like when its possessing demon has broken into segments in order to use it in the same problematic manner shown in the videos posted to MAGIC | High sound volume limits Voices Demons' magic and, especially, Angry Sucker Demons Manipulate Cords [see also VIDEO TIMELINE | Angry Sucker Demons Manipulate Power Cords, which, like a morphing t-shirt, happens within milliseconds:

The white cable is (apparently) possessed by a demon, and is attempting to prevent maneuverability of the black cable, which is connected to the phone I'm holding
The images showing the segmentation of the cable are still frames from the same video in which the demonically mutated t-shirt is shown, which—by a combination of mere happenstance and atypical aggression on the part of the demons' and their people as of late—were captured just as it was broken up at multiple points in order to readily pass through other cables or objects, and otherwise bend and manipulate itself to complicate use [see VIDEO | Wrestling with a Demon-Possessed iPhone in the Dark; see also Comparing demonic activity in light and shadow], and even to assault me [see VIDEO | Drivers launch demons from vehicles, passers-by from pants], as somewhat shown in this video made a few days prior:

In the above video, angry earbuds lash out at me four times while I sit at the breakfast table. This is the third video I have earbuds acting in an untowards manner. The first shows my earbuds refusing to be set onto a tabletop, instead, leaping off of it like a coiled spring; the second, shows them being very uncooperative as I try to put them on, actually twirling away from my hands as I tried to grab them.
NOTE | Viewing each and every video related to angry power cords and the like, which are contained in the linked-to posts above, is essential to appreciating and understanding the information and media contained in this post; so, view them, each and every one.
Other evidence of demon-possessed cord—or, rather, shoelaces—are shown in Sucker demon-possessed shoestrings attack legs on verbal command.

The images showing the segmented cable also show a demonic weapon nestled in and snaking through the rug; they look like tiny, golden-color sucker demons, and burn like Hell. More on that coming up.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

METHOD #1 | Finding hidden demons in digital media | Mapping multispectral digital image sensor data

Before reading this post, familiarize yourself with the fact of hidden demons in digital media by reading Enhancing demon faces made anywhere, at anytime, from anything. It contains several images taken from digital video made during periods of high demonic activity, when and where demons were known to be present, but which could not be readily seen by the naked eye:
The demon lurking behind the door, peering into the room, is not readily seen, but is there, nonetheless

It explains that, although some demons cannot be seen by humans, they might leave an imprint on digital camera sensors which can be detected in the images they produce through advanced image filtering techniques. Each example image is followed by a snapshot of the image filtering process, which, by the way, is called mapping:

Mapping the demon's pixels—amplifying their appearance so they can be seen by the naked eye—is possible due to the sensitivity of digital image sensors to demonic EMF radiation, and the resulting imprint in images they produce
Once a demon's image is mapped—that is to say, the pixels comprising the demon's image are discovered and then separated from the rest of the image's pixels by contrasting, masking, coloring and the like—the process of blending the demon into the rest of the image as realistically as possible begins:

Once the demon's pixels are mapped, the process of realistic coloring and texturing can begin (if possible)
Although some of the images in that post accomplish that to some degree, it's not always possible; but, since the goal is only to detect hidden demons, any such effort should focus only on mapping—and, that, as fast and as efficiently as you can, given the grave danger posed by such demons (i.e., angry, fanged, radioactive, invisible lurkers in the dark).
NOTE | Read the definition of false-color images at the bottom of this post; as it turns out, mapping is also called scientific imaging by the astronomics community. What is shown here and what is done daily by astronomers and landsat operators are almost identical.
Unfortunately, searching for hidden demons in video is a time-consuming process, to say the least. For every second of video, there are at least 30 individual still frames to analyze, and, as aforestated, that not just with the naked eye; rather, several different mapping techniques must be applied to each still frame before any hidden demons can be seen by a human. In just 5 seconds of video, that's 150 images that must be processed and examined.

In order to expedite the search, image-processing scripts are being developed that apply some of the most common filtering techniques used to find demons hidden in the stills. That makes this post a work-in-progress, in that the number of ways a demon may be hidden in a digital image is astoundingly high. Nevertheless, any initiative must begin somewhere, and the impetus behind it demands that it begin now.

Blue-shift demons in the dark
Depending on the particulars of the variety of demon, the cloaking (or invisibility) properties of a given demon's molecules emit EMF radiation that will saturate a digital image with either red, green or blue, much more so than the remaining colors, allowing for a demon to be detected by its EMF footprint by separating the image into red, green and blue channels, and examining them individually:
Separating a digital image into individual RGB channels in GIMP
In the case of the specific variety of demon shown in the example above, its EMF imprint is most visible in the blue channel when it is viewed exclusively:
Compared to red and green, the blue channel shows more of the demon's EMF footprint on the digital image sensor
By comparison, the demon is nearly invisible in the red and green channels when viewed individually:
Red channel only (green and blue disabled)Green channel only (red and blue disabled)
Excluding overlapping channels which have little to no relevant image data from those that do not only identifies the components comprising the demon's image, but also isolates them from the rest of the image so that any brightening and lighten techniques are applied only where needed.

For blue-shift cloaked demons, the blue channel is screened in order to amplify only the pixels containing image data containing the luminosity, hue and saturation properties of the color blue:
Screening the blue channel enhances the demon's visibility by lightening and brightening only blue image data
Having found, isolated and enhanced the components of the image comprising the demon, the image is then recomposed into a composite of the three color channels:
Although only the blue channel was screened (in order to enhance the demon's visibility), the portions of the red and green channels overlapping portions of the blue channel sharing similar properties were color-shifted
Although screening the blue channel enhanced the visibility of the demon by amplifying the image data showing the demon, it also amplified all portions of the image sharing similar properties to that particular color, resulting in a major color-shift throughout the entire image.
NOTE | There is more to a given color than its hue; colors have several properties, which they can share identically, even while looking completely different at a glance. For example, red and green are different in hue—making them appear different—but they can share an identical luminosity—that is the say, the same degree of darkness or lightness—making them the same in that respect.
The inevitable bleed from the enhancements to the target areas of the images into other areas can distort an image in a number of ways—color-shifting, in this case, which can be corrected to a degree by simply applying a color mask made from the original image:
Applying a original-image color mask to a single channel-screened image using 
Imagine performing this procedure—even though it is a simple one—30 times for each second of video to maybe find a hidden demon, and that just to begin the work of enhancing your findings so they can be used to their fullest extent.
NOTE | That works takes much, much time, and is never the same across the board.
That's the purpose of developing image-processing automation, and, hence, this GIMP script, which expedites finding demons in video made under the conditions shown above by performing the discovery-enhancement procedure also shown:

NOTE | The Python script in this post is updated every time there is a breakthrough; today, that was getting the code to open a single frame of a video, process it, save it and move on to the next one—without the user having to open every frame in GIMP first, and then run the script. Saves memory and time, and is what I originally had in mind. 
The problem is, the directions for use in this post have to be updated, and I haven't done that yet. Not a problem to you, though, I assure. The point of this post is, is that process exists for discovery of hidden demons in digital media, and that I can be done quickly and easily. If you're reading this post because I notified you of an opportunity to legitimize your past work—if you're a paranormal investigator, believe me, you need exactly that—then let me do the work for you. Simply forward your video footage to me, and I'll worry about the particulars of processing the video for now.

Running the demon-mapping script (in-progress...)
To run the script shown above:
  1. Copy-and-paste the code into a text editor, and change the directory path of your PNG sequence that was your video file for the mypath variable (sounds hard—isn't).
  2. Copy-and-paste the edited code into the Python-Fu console in GIMP [Filters --> Python-fu --> Console]; then, press Enter twice, type screenbluechannel()and press Enter again:
Running the demon-mapping script from the Python-fu console in GIMP
The script produces two layer groups; deselect the second group to see the results the first layer group produced:
Deselect the second layer group to see the results of the first layer group
Decide which one is best between the two by alternating the visibility of the two layer groups. If the first group is too weak, but the second group is too strong, select the first group, and then select either the Color-brighten or White-brighten layers to increase the strength of the mapping enhancements:
Choose between two optional-display layers in the first layer group to add further demon-mapping enhancements
Following are still frames that were processed by the above script, grouped into four images per row, and grouped into two rows—on top, the amplified blue channel versions; on bottom, the corresponding originals:

Still frames 1 through 4, new on top, original on bottom

Still frames 5 through 8, new on top, original on bottom

Still frames 9 through 12, new on top, original on bottom

Still frames 13 through 16, new on top, original on bottom

Still frames 17 through 20, new on top, original on bottom

Still frames 21 through 24, new on top, original on bottom

Still frames 25 through 28, new on top, original on bottom
To see more enhanced versions of the demon's image, and to compare them to the originals, click a row of images to enlarge it.

This video shows all 28 enhanced still frames in succession (0.5 second apart), cropped for a closer look at the demon:

Another video, which was enhanced with the latest update to the script, shows a yoda-mouthed, ET-foreheaded and Gizmo-eyed blue-shift demon, talking (bottom-right):
Far from perfect, but at least the demon on the bottom-right was found—and found to be talking [click to enlarge]
This video compares two versions of that same video, picture-in-picture: the original (on bottom), and an enhanced version (on top), which image-maps the talking head of a demon, as shown above. This is a very preliminary enhancement, designed for the time being to only detect very-hard-to-detect hidden demons in digital video (realistic enhancements are forthcoming; but, discovery was made priority first):

Notes on further enhancements to the Blue-shift demon-cloak detection script
Having found something useful on the blue channel, I was wondering if the remaining channels can be used in someway, and if the differences between the original image and the blue-screened image can be leveraged in another way to enhance the appearance of such demons even further; I've seen such things before, particularly in dental radiology.

So far, it turns out it can—at least a little bit—by inverting the difference between the original image and the blue-screened images, the demon can be seen much more clearly:
Unfortunately, the image is now washed out and overexposed; but, like color-shifting after screening the blue channel, I think this can just as easily be fixed. It's just a matter of learning how.

Here's the result of a similar operation, in which the product of the aforementioned difference between the original and the blue-screened images is inverted, and then subtracted from it:
The fact that the demon improved without defect, and the relative integrity of the remaining portions of the image are intact—aside from overexposure—indicates that an easy fix is possible without diminishing any gain
Again, the demon is more clear; but, also again, the image is way overexposed.

False-color images
false-color image is an image that depicts a subject in colors that differ from those a faithful full-color photograph would show:
Decomposing the image into wavelets (or subsets of the image's total frequencies) produces a false-color image
The term false-color is typically used to describe images whose colors represent measured intensities outside the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (ie. invisible to the human eye). Color astronomical images are usually false-colored, though the term false-color is misleading here. Coloring an astronomical image involves the careful selection of colors chosen to represent some characteristic in an image, such as intensity, energy or chemical composition. "True Color" images translate intensity information from the invisible to the visible by assigning colors to individual images and combining them:
One attempt at true-color imaging produced the right color, but way too much of it
The colors chosen, usually Red, Green and Blue are usually mapped according to wavelength such that the longest wavelengths of light present in the image are mapped to Red, while shorter wavelengths move through Green and Blue. The colors selected are representative of the physical processes underlying the objects in the images, and display in a single image, as much information as possible that's available from the data; think of it as "representative color". Raw, grayscale image data are transported into image analysis software where adjustments are made to emphasize the individual features or processes that scientists are interested in - or enhanced for aesthetic purposes. It is important to note that at no point in this process are the images modified to create something that isn't already present in the data. Astronomical image processors maintain a careful balance of art and science enhancing the image while meticulously preserving the integrity of the data.

Images taken by telescopes that observe at the "invisible" wavelengths are sometimes called "false color images" or "representative color images."
My "telescope"
That is because the colors used to make them are chosen to bring out important details. The color choice is usually a combination of what works best to show the data, as well as aesthetic choice. The color selection is used as a type of code in which the colors can be associated with the intensity or brightness of the radiation from different regions of the image, or with the energy of the emission.

[see also How can I make a color composite image using Spitzer and/or other data?]

Script revisions to account for deep-in-the-dark demons
A second script is in development to map demons deep in the recesses of the darkest parts of video footage made during a period of high demonic activity; an iteration of it is shown above, but, as shown below, improvements are underway:

It's hard to believe that a somewhat largish head (considering the height) of the demon was that close to the camera, yet was undetectable without special image processing. That, however, is the nature of the demon cloak (which, surprisingly, is less effective in the dark, which is why the camera picked up so much image data from it).