Just posting the pics for now; but, also, a quick note about the image quality and the technique used to acquire an image of an invisible demon on the attack: I know the image is blurred by motion — that's intentional. It's how you capture the light reflected from a demon's cloak (by moving the camera). The light contains so few photons, you have to "scoop" extra light to see it. Running the camera sensor through an emission of photons collects more of them than if you hold it still. That's how you get the blur from the uncloaked objects (by collecting extra photons). It's digital over-exposure, if you will. If I hadn't moved the camera, I would never have seen the face— just as the demon intended. It's a technique to make visible what is otherwise invisible. Why would I not use this technique ? Everybody should use it to determine whether a malevolent entity has taken an aggressive stance (i.e., cloaked) against them in their home. Moving th...
My inevitable demise, daily.