They are everywhere as it is—and, I mean everywhere, even in your own skin [see Demonic weapon/implant emerges from forearm and strikes pancreas]. Demon people have long traded their original body parts to make room for them [see Demons perform surgical operation on Long to install weapon that may have hurt Scratchen], and, now, are storing and deploying them from their mouths:
How the particular demonic weapons shown protruding from the bearer's mouth operates is not yet clear; determining how a weapon may operate based on the operation of other weapons that look similar isn't always reliable, as many look very similar (especially at the early stages of deployment), but operate very differently, and serve different purposes. It's not uncommon to mistake a demonic entity for a demonic weapon or vice versa, either. For example, the weapon shown above looks like a large-variety black sucker demon, and may very well be, for all I know.
Regardless, what makes it clear that it is intended for harm is the same for all other weapons: they're cloaked, and therefore are discovered during periods of high demonic activity by their inadvertant capture on digital media (while the video camera and/or subject is in-motion), and are only shown in but a few still frames; and, they are always deployed in your personal space while your back is turned, and almost always by a well-known aggressor.
Another indicator is per a phenomenon that has yet to be discussed on this blog. What it is called (or could be called), I don't know; but, basically, it involves hiding or camouflaging a demon, demonic entity or demonic weapon or equipment by obtaining a position between the target and a similarly shaped and/or colored/textured object in their environment in order to blend with (conceal) it, and somehow hiding in two-dimensional space versus three-dimensional space so as to conceal its proximity.
There is no depth in two-dimensional space; from any given perspective, everything is the same distance along the z-plane. How far above or below, or to either of two sides remain.
That's the best way I can describe it, even after examining hundreds and hundreds of still frames showing it, one of them being the still frame in the top-left corner in the image above (and below):
The imprint left by second-dimension cloaks on digital camera sensors suggest that there is some kind of difference, even if not the one I suggest. They are sharper and more detailed in general, but also throughout the entire set of still frames in which they are shown; by contrast, fourth-dimension cloaks are blurrier, usually yielding one or two cognizable images out of, say, 5 or 6 stills, somewhere in the middle. Rarely do such images produce detail or are defined by sharp borders as are the two shown above.
Mouth-stored and deployed demonic weapons are hard to catch in media, requiring close and prolonged proximity to a weapons-bearer and, unfortunately, a weapon, too |
Regardless, what makes it clear that it is intended for harm is the same for all other weapons: they're cloaked, and therefore are discovered during periods of high demonic activity by their inadvertant capture on digital media (while the video camera and/or subject is in-motion), and are only shown in but a few still frames; and, they are always deployed in your personal space while your back is turned, and almost always by a well-known aggressor.
Another indicator is per a phenomenon that has yet to be discussed on this blog. What it is called (or could be called), I don't know; but, basically, it involves hiding or camouflaging a demon, demonic entity or demonic weapon or equipment by obtaining a position between the target and a similarly shaped and/or colored/textured object in their environment in order to blend with (conceal) it, and somehow hiding in two-dimensional space versus three-dimensional space so as to conceal its proximity.
There is no depth in two-dimensional space; from any given perspective, everything is the same distance along the z-plane. How far above or below, or to either of two sides remain.
That's the best way I can describe it, even after examining hundreds and hundreds of still frames showing it, one of them being the still frame in the top-left corner in the image above (and below):
The imprint left by second-dimension cloaks on digital camera sensors suggest that there is some kind of difference, even if not the one I suggest. They are sharper and more detailed in general, but also throughout the entire set of still frames in which they are shown; by contrast, fourth-dimension cloaks are blurrier, usually yielding one or two cognizable images out of, say, 5 or 6 stills, somewhere in the middle. Rarely do such images produce detail or are defined by sharp borders as are the two shown above.