A Demoniac's Guide to Snitching: How to tattle on the demon mafia, and live to write about it

On Quora, someone asked whether it is legal to fetch and display public personal data about people? I answered because I have a little experience publishing personal data about people [see PLACES | Demon-infested homes]—and that under the most extreme circumstances anyone might do this—and I thought that, based on that fact, my answer might add some color and interest that others answers are not likely to have.

I think it is indeed colorful, in that, somehow, my answer segues into a series of things you must do prior to publishing personal-but-public information about criminals who committed crimes against you. For the first time since putting people on blast since 2006¸ I've enumerated and described how to prevent increasing crime against you, and otherwise snitch with the likelihood of the least volatile reaction. It was culminated per the counsel of police, the criminals themselves, and their peers—a multitude of other career criminals who did not commit the crimes complained of and were not affiliated with the criminals who committed them, but who offered "advice" on how to do what I did "correctly" as possible, if I must in fact do it. After I posted the dirt (as it were), my counsel (as it were) all said three things:

  1. they didn't like the idea or what they heard about it before they read it, but they don't blame me now that they have read it, the circumstances being more egregious than what they themselves feel comfortable imposing on one person;
  2. they approved of the way I did it (I didn't say more than I had to, and the amount of work I put into it was obviously substantial, and hard work is appreciated by all; and,
  3. they intend to keep their disgust silent and unmoving, which meant I escaped the designation of being called a snitch, and all the things that come with that.

Here's what I wrote:
Before I answer your question: 
In every state, there are statutes governing the acquisition, use and publication of public information. They are published online, and hard copies are freely available at every public law library. These statutes are invariably prefaced by the meaning of public, but it is a common sense definition, with no pitfalls or loopholes. So, I'm not concerned that you mean anything different than information that is freely and readily available to everyone, and information that is distributed by a custodian who is under and complies with a legally prescribed obligation to provide that same information to anyone requesting it. 
Now, my answer: 
Yes, and for any purpose, except to commit a crime, such as criminal stalking or for subsequent fraudulent use by a third party, or to influence or alter trade market shareholder values (where applicable) in order to unlawfully obtain financial gain by any subsequent dividends or surplus or by short-selling; misuse without criminal intent or use without permission under certain circumstances may incur civil penalties. There is no such thing as a legal obligation for any common citizen to protect the personal information of another outside of a legal, business or contractual arrangement clearly established prior to disclosure—and, if it's public as defined by statute, especially so. 
It’s even legal to slander someone, provided it does not place the subject in danger, nor does it impute them to a serious crime for which you did not witness or a criminal complaint has not been filed or for which the subject has not been charged, arrested or convicted, and if the publication is not a component of a crime or of a crime to which it can be composited (or enhances the degree to which either was being committed). 
The illegal publication of personal data does not usually define a crime itself, but merely forms an element of proof for another crime and/or enhances or supplements the degree to which a given crime was alleged to be committed or provides a complement to a composite of crimes to form a single crime that carries a charge. In the case of the latter, criminal intent is usually established only when personal data was published repeatedly, and each publication can be readily ascertained as a means to further the commission of another crime under the circumstances and in its purported context. 
While some crimes are constituted by the unlawful acquisition of personal information, it may be technically legal to publish it, even though it was stolen; however, the publication of stolen information can be used to prove the commission of the theft. On the other hand, some data thefts are not defined as such until the data is published. 
Law enforcement agencies generally only pursue allegations where victims sustained substantial loss (usually corporate victims) due to the cost of and time involved for an investigation to prove criminal intent by and to calculate loss or damage from the unlawful acquisition and/or publication of personal information is exorbitant. District attorneys generally will not file affidavits for a crime of data theft or unlawful publication thereof even if it can be established by a single occurrence unless it is committed multiple times by the same offender and under the eye of an investigative body to which the complainant filed a report. 
Even if legal, publication of personal information may not always be advisable, particularly when doing so provides no remedy for loss or damage or fails to prevent same (or warn), or when another remedy for loss or damage exists and has yet to be pursued, and especially when loss or damage has been remedied or when doing so may place you or others in danger of harm. 
In 2006, I publicized personal information of persons purported to have committed crimes against me and others. Attack of the Gangstalkers is a video summarizing that information in less than a minute, and directs you to a perfect example of a legal publication of personal but public information that follows several of the above advisements, specifically:
  • The publication of the criminal acts/history warn others of the stated intent by the subjects to repeat and/or habitually commit those acts
  • All available alternative remedies were exhausted, but failed by no fault of the publisher (me), and there were no penalties imposed on the subject that can be compounded by the publication of personal information
  • It places me in danger, but not others—and that, not by design, but by circumstance; not even an infinitesimal possibility of danger to others had been ascertained, in that there are no appearances that remotely suggest that the publication of the information and the manner in which it was published was carefully crafted to protect others from danger by hiding their involvement
Although I advise against snitching, it can be (and was) a reasonable risk under these specific circumstances:
  1. You are already in danger to the extreme, and exposing the crimes committed against you might dissuade the persons committing them, as well as others providing their material support
  2. You have no means of third-party, physical protection and are unable to provide your own for all reasons
  3. You are the sole victim of the crimes you publish, and you are the only witness
  4. The crimes are serious, and you have, in fact, sustained significant loss or damage to property and/or have been injured or threatened with brandished weapons, and you have overlooked everything than what most people would consider less (you’re going by the judgment of others on this, not your own)
  5. The crimes are likely to be repeated or will lead to other crimes or compel others to commit crimes against you
  6. Every other legal means of remedy has been pursued with due diligence [completely, thoroughly and in timely fashion], and your full cooperation was given to those who can facilitate remedy, and to their complete satisfaction
  7. That, prior to pursuing available remedies, you made at least one attempt to resolve the matter with the subjects in a way deemed reasonable and feasible by both parties, and that the attempt was witnessed by peers on both sides
  8. That you were not contributorily negligent in any way, shape or form to the crimes committed against you (some say this shouldn't matter; but, when it matters to someone, it then matters—especially with career criminals. I added this qualifier to emphasize that a balanced picture of the circumstances surrounding the crime(s) is essential; although you are a victim, you could incite further and more serious crime at the acquiescence of others who may have frowned on such if you use your victim status as a license to portray a monster that doesn't exist to literally everyone the subject knows—including his/her parents)
  9. That you have taken every available step to ensure your safety and the safety of others around you prior to publication, and employed any and all means at your disposal for preventing a reoccurrence of the crimes you publish
  10. That you have provided the fewest possible details to achieve adequate warning and prevention
  11. That you can ensure that your publication is distributed to every person who could be affected by it, including the subject, persons like the subject, and everyone inside the geographical area in which the subject committed, commits or may commit the crimes you published
The now-shuttered, but downloadable The Sunnyvale Knock blog met all 11 conditions prior to publication, and even was announced prior to the subjects before it went live; moreover, it used the words of the criminals and accomplices themselves to provide an account of the crimes (via voice recordings). 
By the way, if you’re interested in the information I posted about the subjects after shutting down the blog, read these posts to The Life of a Demoniac:
If you’re not in the mood to read, listen to Secret Recording Reveals Demonic Agenda, by far the most compelling recording of them all, primarily because the subject matter discussed between the two persons heard in it is still relevant.
at

Feigned ignorance is the new white lie

I love answering questions about demons on Quora simply because of this blog; I simply point to it whenever any question about the existence of demons arise. If one post alone doesn't convince someone, I simply recommend they add to the other 999 or so posts, which, collectively, should remove all doubt about whether demons exist, and what some of them are up to on this planet (that is, if doubt existed at all).

I always get upvoted (similar to "Like" on Facebook) for my answers, even though some who read my answers do criticize from time-to-time. For example:

She forgot to take a look at the blog; even still, I can deliver demons right to her doorstep at-will, so, if she really wants testable evidence....
At first glance, I wasn't sure if this was more of the typical heckling I get from demon collaborators; but, on closer inspection, it lacked the ridiculousness that comes with such. This person just looks a wee bit behind the rest of the class.
NOTE | You can read my answers to demon-related and other questions on my Quora profile.
Same thing with the answers to the question as to whether demons exist prior to my contributions; they seem to have demon-people origins, they are so off. But, lacking the requisite ego-stroking innuendo or I-know-but-I'm-not-telling phrase here and there, I'd say these people are simply ignorant to the point of being dangerous:

Are demons real?
Out of 200,000 years of humans existing, there has yet to be a single solitary speck of evidence supporting the existence of beings referred to as “demons”. None. Zero. Zilch.
People claiming things is not evidence. They need evidence to support their claims.
It is safe to say that this concept, originated by humans in the first place as a way of explaining things that were not understood in the past (much like how people thought a human fetus came from a “homunculus” before we understood biology better, or that bad smells could carry diseases and so you just had to block out the smells to avoid getting sick, etc.), has no credibility whatsoever.
Remember: Believing something doesn’t make it real, and insisting demons exist but not having evidence to support that claim does not suffice as evidence. Just because some people may not require evidence to believe something fantastical for which there is no support does not mean everyone else is going to accept their feelings as proof of something which supposedly exists and functions independent of their feelings.
And when those who do not believe as they do and do not share their feelings consistently remain immune and unaffected by these “demons”, it should really make a rational human being start questioning whether those who say demons exist and that they’ve had experiences with them are only saying that because they are predisposed to wishing these things were real, since those who don’t believe in demons never have any interactions with them.
Not believing in demons is a 100% guaranteed method of not having any interaction with them.
Are demons real and can they hurt you? 
Answer A. Is any entity real? No. To see anything as differentiated from anything else is an illusion caused by your identification with something differentiated from everything else, like a body or a mind. What you see is determined by your desires and fears. Reality, on the other hand, is singular, meaning it doesn't consist of objects, things - they are just a common fantasy within reality. Reality is everything and nothing, which means it is also you. The real you is all of reality.
Answer B. Demons are within you. Everyone has their own unique sets. Some have it as jealousy, some as hatred. Some fear them, some befriend them. They hurt you when you let them over-power you.
Answer C. No, demons are not real, and no, they can't hurt you. The only sense in which "demons" actually exist is in the metaphorical sense of someone being "driven by their demons". This means someone having a bad mental habit or compulsion that causes them to do things that harm themselves or the people around them, but which are so engrained they find them hard to change. This could be physical, like excessive drinking, or more psychological, like jealousy. But these demons, too, can be banished if we understand them as unhelpful patterns of behavior and work to break them down.
Answer D. The scientist in me agrees with most replies here on Quora. That is, supernatural events do not exist. 
There are few religions I know of that do not believe in dark forces; either jinns, Devils, black magic or sorcery.
To believe in God necessitates a belief in the devil, at least so far as logic dictates. One cannot admit one supernatural power without admitting others.
As has been reported by Pope Francis, the devil does exist. The uptick in requests for exorcism by Catholic priests suggests that there are still many who believe in both positive and negative supernatural forces: http://www.ibtimes.com/pope-fran... 
But belief doesn't make something true, it only proves that the believer believes.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of anything supernatural and unless there are some spectacular breakthroughs with quantum technology, there won't be in the foreseeable future.
Personally, I sit on the fence, having seen too many inexplicable events in my own personal life to make a resounding no on the topic of demons. 
I therefore admit the possibility of my own delusions, elemental possession and/or naivety.
I believe that those things which cannot be explained by science will most likely be explained with further advances in science.
Until that time, perhaps leave science to continue its quantum investigations and take anecdotal evidence for what it is - someone's subjective opinion of reality.
And for those curious about dark forces, I'd caution you about playing the devil's advocate. I've seen my fair share of psychiatric hospitals.
at

Excerpts from my guest appearance on live Internet radio (IN-PROGRESS)

I'm still working on this post; soon, it'll contain a transcript of my entire live interview on Internet radio. In the meantime, here is what people are saying about it:
Well-spoken with thoughts very organized put my mind at ease (being my biggest fear that I sounded otherwise) until I actually listened to the rebroadcast
You can download a copy of the program at the end of this post...

Excerpt: Off to a rocky start
Well-spoken with thoughts very organized, my ass. Well, at least to start. My biggest fear about interviewing before a live audience about a demon blog manifested itself from the get-go, during which the interview asked first the only question I specifically stated I didn't want to answer myself, namely, the one about who I am. I wanted the interviewer to write and make an announcement that described me to his audience, not only because he knows them better, but because he could justify his decision in his own words as to why he chose me as a special guest in the first place. It caught me off guard, and I totally fumbled and tumbled my way through the most incomprehensible answer one could give. Here is the travesty that is my foray into the world of live broadcasting:

00:08:58
Rodney
(to audience) It’s our honor to welcome our special guest tonight, Mr. James Bush. (to James) Hello, James, thank you for joining us tonight, bud!
James
You bet, Rodney! Glad to be here. [conversation by loud, rude customers at local restaurant] Can you hear me?
Rodney
Yeah, I can hear you; can you hear us?
James
Okay, I sure can; I sure can. [chuckles]
Rodney
Good, good, good. Well, let’s just  start off: can you tell us a little bit about yourself, bud?
James
Well, alright, I guess what brought us together was my blog, uh, about demons [chuckles] and demonic activity in my area and in my life. And, that is what I have been mostly about since I started it in the past five years. But, it…that situation’s been going on a little bit, maybe, longer. Uh, it did start, you know, at birth; but, it wasn’t a problem that I advertised and such until five years ago; and, it wasn’t a significant problem that I could put a finger on until maybe ten years ago. And, so, the [part of the] story [that] I think…is most interesting to people—and the one that introduces it is, uh, is the…is, uh, in 2006—I think you posted a, uh…one of my videos [that] kinda talks about some of my experiences in 2006 to the…to your, uh, BlogTalk [Radio] page, uh, a while back. It’s the one that [is entitled,] “Attack of the Gangstalkers.” That was the one that [tells when] things really kicked off with me; and, uh, that’s, uh, that’s kinda…that’s kinda, uh, what I’m about. I’m about those things—and, only about those things, since they require my full-time attention. And, it has it, whether I [want to] put any time or attention into it or not, to be honest with you; it’s that intense.


Above is the video that Rodney's audience was supposed to have seen and/or been shown as I mentioned it in the broadcast. My answer relied and depended upon that familiarity; otherwise, you would have lost interest in the program right about the time I said the word intense.

Following that, you need to read the description of the video, which I've provided below for your convenience:
This decade-old teaser ad is comprised of a series of audio clips from secretly recorded phone calls, each of which were posted in full to the now-defunct The Sunnyvale Knock web site (otherwise known as the "web site that started the demonic war"). 
The phone calls were made in 2006 by me to various members of a gang that committed criminal acts against me and others at the behest of demons—a fact I knew nothing of during that time. The clips, along with illustrations of the persons heard in them, play one-after-another, each portending to one crime out of a series of crimes that were committed against me in rapid succession and over the course of about one-and-a-half months. This tactic was employed to give me little to no time to seek redress for any one crime prior to another one being committed, even though that would only be a hindrance to timely filing of a complaint or a cause of slow resolution due to the sheer bulk of it. 
The reason why no complaint was ever pursued by local police and why no criminal was ever prosecuted for any of the crimes they committed by them—not even the ones they admit to in the recordings—is not made clear until the end of the video: an admission of mass proportions made by the gang's ring-leader in the last clip, when he eludes to local police corruption of which I am clearly already aware. That admission is solidified when combined with the rest of the phone call and other materials posted to the site, to which the ad was meant to drive traffic. 
The aforementioned high-level overview of the content provided by The Sunnyvale Knock web site introduced by the video fueled my hope that the site, in combination with the ad, would raise awareness of the atrocities committed against me and many others by gangs such as this one by providing evidence of the issues I faced in the form of unknowing admissions of guilt by the perpetrators. The voices in this video are, in fact, the self-spoken words of both witnesses and perpetrators, and are accompanied by illustrations of their actual likeness; so, I thought it would be successful. 
The successor to that site, The Life of a Demoniac, explains why it was not. 
The means by which I acquired the recordings are not that complex (I simply called some of them up, and recorded their answers to my carefully posed questions); it is, however, confusing to many as to why they would even admit to the person they injured that they, in fact, injured them. All I can say is that, based on my subsequent interaction with the demons behind that agenda over the ensuing decade, it's probably because they were less concerned about their crimes, and more concerned with finding help for a much bigger concern: the fact that demons were using them the way they were ("...we prolong people's inevitable demise...including our own"). Imagine being trapped by that dynamic, having hurt people, but only having people, to call for help.\ 
Ironically, I am now that help (as it were), should they still need it, having been submerged in the problem for a decade at great expense to all things important, and having been quite successful at thwarting and otherwise hindering the advance of the demonic agenda against persons, who are (or were) targeted by The Exclusion (a demon-led culling campaign). 
The Sunnyvale Knock web site, which contains the complete phone recordings and additional information about them, is downloadable from its successor, The Life of a Demoniac blog.

Nearly 7 years passed between the shuttering of The Sunnyvale Knock web site and the start of The Life of a Demoniac blog, posts for which have been actively published for over five years, garnering nearly 4 million readers in that time—and still growing, exponentially. 
The tagline for The Life of a Demoniac is "My inevitable demise, daily," which is derived from the mission statement spoken by the leader of the gang that exploited me seven years earlier, as heard in one of the audio clips: "...we prolong peoples' inevitable demise, including our own." 
The tagline was chosen to link the two sites, and to mock those who think evil will triumph in the end, having been since the beginning "troubled on every side, yet not distressed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed." [2 Corinthians 4:8-9] My expectation is that this will continue to be the case until evil's end, that hope resting on Psalm 107.
There's no way I could even begin to squeeze all that into the few minutes allotted for an answer to that question. Thankfully, Rodney moved on fairly quickly to the nitty-gritty, and that's where I picked up some steam

 [missing: about an hour and a half of the show; transcripts coming soon; below, an excerpt from the end of the interview, which gives away the climax, but, something I wanted to put out there first for some reason]

 Excerpt: How would you describe your inevitable demise?
Most people in-the-know would find it an offensive question to ask me what my future held as a demoniac. It's almost never asked; and, when it is, it almost always comes with an apology of sorts:

Pretty hard thing to say to someone really tormented by [demons]
But, to those relatively new to the situation—like Robyn Dalton, co-host of Within the Chaos, a BlogTalk radio production—who, at the end of a nearly two-hour long on-air interview asked this very question, it seems perfectly natural:
What does your future look like? 
My perfectly natural answer, unscripted, no less:
Terrific. I put Jesus at the helm. I confessed Him; I confess Him in thought, word and deed. I make mistakes; but—I’ll tell you what—He’s the first to know about them, and He’s the first I ask for help with them.
I have no doubt this: Jesus hasn’t put anything in front of me that I cannot overcome—if not by myself, He can do it; and, so, I see my future with hope. Although I am [often] discouraged, I get right back up and keep moving.
I know that [my] hope comes from Christ. Nobody keeps making the same mistakes over and over and over again and has any kind of hope left after awhile; and, yet, I do! And, it is as strong as ever, and keeps getting stronger.
I know that is Christ working in me. I will overcome. And, that is how I see my future—as a conqueror.
I've justified my beliefs in numerous posts to this blog, one of the best and most thorough being in The Testimony of a Demoniac. My inevitable salvation, explained.

at

Love thy neighbor (from Hell)

Somehow, I'm not surprised to find myself one of the most viewed writers in the Demons (supernatural beings) category on Quora:
I'm pretty passionate about the topic, and not just because I'm integral to their industry in this world as the Door. Exploring strange new worlds, and seeking out new life and new civilizations, boldly going where no man has gone before—or at least this man—is fun, even in the face of all its vagaries. That passion has a way of finding itself in places you wouldn't expect to find it, such as advice on how to handle a bad neighbor. Nonetheless, that's exactly where I stuck it a couple of days ago.

My advice on handling crazy neighbors in a world plagued by demons is as sound as it is unique; even still, I wonder what Dear Abby would say, were she alive today, to this Quora reader, who answered this question posed by another reader: What is something crazy your neighbor has done?

After reading his answer, intuition told me there might be more about his nemesis than meets the eye. First, here's what the answerer said (my response follows):
This saga begins around 3 years ago. My neighbor Is a compulsive liar and all round weirdo. I asked him to move his big fancy BMW as he has an entire car park at the rear of his property but liked to park it out the front, taking up 3 car spaces just so everyone knew it was his. We had absolutely no off street parking so his ridiculously long car, and the way in which he parked threw the rest of the street out with parking. After asking him to park his car at the rear he appeared ok with the suggestion as he had no reasonable response as to why he couldn’t park there, but was a little cold towards me. This encounter happened at the local pub so I shrugged it off and enjoyed my beer. 
The following Friday I head to the same watering hole and was pulled aside by another friend that informed me the neighbor, lets call him Sam, had been there telling everyone I was doing drugs and beating my partner. (If you knew me you would know this is so far fetched it’s unbelievable!). I waited until Sam came into the pub about an hour later and with several people there that he had said these things too (Sam was already not well liked). I confronted him about the awful things he had said and asked him why he would make up such things. He stared at myself and the other people, called us all liars, denied everything, told us we were all f**ked, and left. 
3 days later my real estate call and tell me there has been a massive complaint of that neighbor about me trying to get me evicted. Luckily this didn’t work as they knew everyone in the street had already had issues with the neighbor. 
1 week later, the neighbor puts up security cameras all focused on my house. 
2 weeks later the whole street is abuzz with excitement. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s a….. Right out the front of my house!
Sam then proceeded to tell everyone that I had myself done that nifty bit of art out the front. Nobody believed Sam. I told Sam I wished him all the best for his life but from here on out not to talk to me or my partner or about us and we would do him the same diligence. Fast forward to barely even seeing Sam for a full twelve months and one morning I get a random text message asking if I still sold homewares, how beautiful they are, and can they order some. I knew it was Sam’s number, as in the past, pre move your car he had placed orders with me. I blocked the number and didn’t reply as I didn’t want to open a dialogue. 
3 days later: 4 empty pot plants were thrown at my car. 
7 days later: 2 more empty pot plants are thrown at my car. 
8 days later: we got security cameras. 
No doubt I will be updating this story soon enough. Some people never quit. Also, to people wondering why we don’t move. We love the house and the area and I don’t give into bullies. 
UPDATE: Ok. So it has been a little while but to keep you all informed several weeks after the pot plant incident occurred my partner and myself got news from the real estate that our house was going on the market to be sold. We wanted to stay in the area so started looking at houses close by.  As soon as the for sale sign went up we started to see Sam everywhere looking smug and had heard as usual he was telling everyone how happy he was we were moving and he wouldn’t have to put up with us or our shit anymore. (oh yes always the victim is Sam). What Sam didn’t know is that we had applied for a beautiful house on the corner of our old block, much better than the old house. Our close friends that knew how badly we wanted this house kept it a secret as we all knew if Sam found out he would call the real estate (it was through a different real estate) and start trouble again. 
Finally after a 4 day wait we got news we were approved for the house and could sign the lease the following week. Moving day came and even though we were only moving a block we hired removers for several hours for all of the heavy large items and moved the small items ourselves. We started early and saw no sign of Sam. Our new place is bliss, the house is huge and thank god our immediate neighbors are really lovely. 
Fast forward 2 months and I had managed to only see Sam once briefly, walking into the pub and had just ignored him. At this point Sam has upset many other people and has been kicked out of the local pub a few times so is more frequently hanging out at a venue in another suburb where people don’t know him yet. I thought I was finally free of him and his bullshit until last Monday night….. I was cooking dinner (our kitchen window looks out onto the street) and suddenly felt like I was being watched. I caught movement out of the corner of my eye and turned to look out of the window…. There was Sam with a horrible smirk on his face waving at me, He was carrying a large bag of god only knows and when he heard me call my partners name promptly turned and walked away. This is incredibly creepy, not only for the watching me through my window factor but because the way my neighborhood is mapped out Sam actually had to walk past the front of his house to get to my place and try to frighten me only to walk on past the side and front of my house to then go to the rear of his property. He actually went far far out of his way to do that! freaky dickhead. Anyway that is it for now but I will update with anymore events.
There were numerous other responses to this question, all of which took a similar approach, each relaying their own personal experiences with their respective neighbors-from-Hell; but, of all of them, this is the only one that struck me as...familiar.

Anyway, instead of relaying one of my stories, I spoke directly to this one, suggesting reconsideration of the assumption of "crazy," and proposed "beleaguered" in its stead. Here's what I said:
All the answers to this question are very interesting, and I like how everyone tries to keep a little humor about their respective situations. 
Let me advise, though, that these days, it's more often than not an external factor that drives a person's bizarre behavior — not so much a bad psyche as once may have been more likely the case. 
Before I suggest a possibility for it, let's first consider a few key facts about the antagonist who spray painted a giant dick on the street in front of someone's house: 
  1. He drives and maintains an expensive vehicle.
  2. He owns and maintains a respectable home in a respectable neighborhood.
  3. He is gainfully employed, if his disposable income is any indication, seeing that it affords him drinks at a pub more than one night a week.
These three things alone tell me everything I need to know about his mental health—it's solid for now. 
What I sense is an antagonist on his end of things—something others can't or don't see, but looms large in his life. There are such detractors in this world that can work a man day and night, for years on end, and can't be stopped or avoided—or detected by others (yet).
What that eventually does to a man is it makes him hyper-reactive. He sees slights where their aren't, or where they are minuscule, and attacks them in a way one might if their survival were at stake. 
If you knew the kind of evil I’m describing, you’d totally understand; if you don't, you never will until you meet it for yourself. 
But, until then, consider this: approach him with this, and ask if he’s ever heard or seen anything like it: 
The Life of a Demoniac 
Here are some of the faces behind the kind of evil I'm talking about:
If you think your neighbor has this problem, I'm available 24/7 via Facebook Messenger by scanning this code:

at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)